| | PRINCE WILLIAM ENGAGED- SHOULD HE BE KING OF ENGLAND ? | |
|
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
joefrank Five Star Member


Number of posts: 4451 Registration date: 2008-11-04 Age: 63 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
 | Subject: PRINCE WILLIAM ENGAGED- SHOULD HE BE KING OF ENGLAND ? Tue Nov 16, 2010 2:34 pm | |
| 11/16/2010 The big news out of England is Prince William is engaged, I'm happy for him... Should he be crowned King of England over his father Prince Charles ? I'll go first: I say Prince William should be crowned King Of England... Cheers..Joe |
|
 | |
alice Five Star Member


Number of posts: 11041 Registration date: 2008-10-22
 | Subject: Re: PRINCE WILLIAM ENGAGED- SHOULD HE BE KING OF ENGLAND ? Tue Nov 16, 2010 3:05 pm | |
| Joe,
I quite agree with you. Charles cannot be the king because he is divorced. William would be great. |
|
 | |
joefrank Five Star Member


Number of posts: 4451 Registration date: 2008-11-04 Age: 63 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
 | Subject: Re: PRINCE WILLIAM ENGAGED- SHOULD HE BE KING OF ENGLAND ? Tue Nov 16, 2010 3:09 pm | |
| 11/16/2010 Alice.. I agree with you 1000% I wonder what Shelagh thinks ? I think Prince William has the same grace his mother did Princess Diana, she was loved... Cheers..Joe |
|
 | |
Shelagh Admin


Number of posts: 9705 Registration date: 2008-01-11 Location: UK
 | Subject: Re: PRINCE WILLIAM ENGAGED- SHOULD HE BE KING OF ENGLAND ? Tue Nov 16, 2010 4:23 pm | |
| I think the Queen should live forever. _________________ Shelagh Watkins http://shelaghwatkins.co.uk/
|
|
 | |
alice Five Star Member


Number of posts: 11041 Registration date: 2008-10-22
 | Subject: Re: PRINCE WILLIAM ENGAGED- SHOULD HE BE KING OF ENGLAND ? Tue Nov 16, 2010 5:24 pm | |
| |
|
 | |
joefrank Five Star Member


Number of posts: 4451 Registration date: 2008-11-04 Age: 63 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
 | Subject: Re: PRINCE WILLIAM ENGAGED- SHOULD HE BE KING OF ENGLAND ? Tue Nov 16, 2010 6:33 pm | |
| 11/16/2010
The Queen will live to be 105 ! Older than the Queen Mom....
Cheers..Joe |
|
 | |
LC Five Star Member


Number of posts: 4211 Registration date: 2009-03-28
 | Subject: Re: PRINCE WILLIAM ENGAGED- SHOULD HE BE KING OF ENGLAND ? Wed Nov 17, 2010 3:04 am | |
| Kate's wearing Diana's engagement ring. Considering how that marriage went, I personally would ask for a new one. I'm superstitious like that.  |
|
 | |
Shelagh Admin


Number of posts: 9705 Registration date: 2008-01-11 Location: UK
 | Subject: Re: PRINCE WILLIAM ENGAGED- SHOULD HE BE KING OF ENGLAND ? Wed Nov 17, 2010 7:44 am | |
| I think they are sensible enough to put superstition aside. I think the ring signifies his mother's presence in their marriage. It's only symbolic but I guess it means a lot. It is the importance we attach to material things that matters not the things themselves.
Youcan see the interview here:
http://video.news.sky.com/skynews/video?videoSourceID=043335&flashURL=feeds/skynews/latest/flash/161110-ROYAL-INTERVIEW.flv _________________ Shelagh Watkins http://shelaghwatkins.co.uk/
|
|
 | |
joefrank Five Star Member


Number of posts: 4451 Registration date: 2008-11-04 Age: 63 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
 | Subject: Re: PRINCE WILLIAM ENGAGED- SHOULD HE BE KING OF ENGLAND ? Wed Nov 17, 2010 2:56 pm | |
| 11/17/2010 I beleive they will make a great couple, I think it's very touching he gave her his Mom's engagement ring. Every time I see Prince William he reminds me of Princess Diana, a very gracious caring human being.. Cheers..Joe |
|
 | |
LC Five Star Member


Number of posts: 4211 Registration date: 2009-03-28
 | Subject: Re: PRINCE WILLIAM ENGAGED- SHOULD HE BE KING OF ENGLAND ? Wed Nov 17, 2010 3:40 pm | |
| | Shelagh wrote: | | I think they are sensible enough to put superstition aside. |
Well, when the marriage hits the skids in a few years, I'll be here to say, "I told you so!" lol |
|
 | |
alice Five Star Member


Number of posts: 11041 Registration date: 2008-10-22
 | Subject: Re: PRINCE WILLIAM ENGAGED- SHOULD HE BE KING OF ENGLAND ? Wed Nov 17, 2010 4:10 pm | |
| LC,
Do you know something we don't?
Some marriages last and are happy. Why not theirs? Why not wish them the best?
"Sufficient to the day is the evil thereof."
This is a wedding--not a funeral!
A doom and gloom attitude is inappropriate and so also is a prognostication of failure. |
|
 | |
joefrank Five Star Member


Number of posts: 4451 Registration date: 2008-11-04 Age: 63 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
 | Subject: Re: PRINCE WILLIAM ENGAGED- SHOULD HE BE KING OF ENGLAND ? Wed Nov 17, 2010 4:29 pm | |
| 11/17/2010 Alice.. I agree with you 1000% , I believe they will be happy , I guess some people are envious ! And they lead a miserable life so they want everone else to misreable ! Cheers..Joe |
|
 | |
LC Five Star Member


Number of posts: 4211 Registration date: 2009-03-28
 | Subject: Re: PRINCE WILLIAM ENGAGED- SHOULD HE BE KING OF ENGLAND ? Wed Nov 17, 2010 4:36 pm | |
| A ring from a failed marriage brings bad energy! |
|
 | |
alice Five Star Member


Number of posts: 11041 Registration date: 2008-10-22
 | Subject: Re: PRINCE WILLIAM ENGAGED- SHOULD HE BE KING OF ENGLAND ? Wed Nov 17, 2010 4:46 pm | |
| Are you also upset if a black cat crosses your path, a mirror breaks? |
|
 | |
LC Five Star Member


Number of posts: 4211 Registration date: 2009-03-28
 | Subject: Re: PRINCE WILLIAM ENGAGED- SHOULD HE BE KING OF ENGLAND ? Wed Nov 17, 2010 5:12 pm | |
| Nope. They're not carrying bad energy from a failed marriage! |
|
 | |
| | PRINCE WILLIAM ENGAGED- SHOULD HE BE KING OF ENGLAND ? | |
|